I was not able to get OpenNLP parser to work. There were no samples to play with, no command line tools to run. And I don’t even want to talk about documentation. That’s because there was not any. There was an attempt at lame joke (at least that’s the only sense I can make of what.html file), but no actual documentation.
Finally, I pinged my research colleague who did get the toolkit working (thanks Scott).
Bikel’s statistical parser is designed to be run from the command line. I need to run it from my own code.
The following wrapper seems to do the trick on windows (with your own values for|parserdir| :
`Bikel’s statistical parser is designed to be run from the command line. I need to run it from my own code.
The following wrapper seems to do the trick on windows (with your own values for|parserdir| :
I have been using Stanford NLP Parser from command line with -tagSeparator flag to supply it with partially tagged input. As the parser seems to be really bad with date expressions and complex name entities, I need this functionality.
Now, I need to wrap-up the parser in my own code to add input/output batching and I discover that this option is not accepted when constructing parser from the code. Despite javadoc saying that LexicalizedParser.
I am trying to use Stanford NLP parser for my research and I need to look at the trees it produces for large, complex sentences. I have found several packages for laying out the output as trees, but they are all seem to be targeted at visualizing smaller sentences, suitable for illustrating a point in the published paper.
Sample output of Graphviz layout for Stanford Parser’s output
My trees are large.
I am looking into Struts 2 and finding its multi-layered defaults somewhat confusing. Specifically, it took forever to fully understand blank demo application that comes bundled with it. Specifically, I could not understand how the example switches between the languages.
From the jsp page, it was clear that it was using the parameter request_locale to indicate the language. But then the parameter just disappears. It actually is not mentioned anywhere else in the source code.